Five Ways Government Workers and Officials Are Master Placemakers

O n Memorial Day, we celebrate the sacrifice of the many men and women of our Armed Forces that have passed on either in battle or having lived a full civilian life. My PaPa was a World War II veteran and his presence was missed as we gathered around the table and the grill at my house yesterday.

Before everyone came over, I was sitting at my kitchen table writing in my urbanist journal and I thought about how some other, more mundane, public servants actually make our places. I’m talking about everyone from the mayors, to the town and city planners, to the grant administrators, to the classically trained government service generalists (MPA’s, MPP’s and the like) such as myself. Even people such as firefighters and police can be placemakers, as they are the ones who spearhead events like National Night Out and make sure we have safe places to go.

In essence, I came up with yet another list of five specific ways us government workers, elected officials and those of us without a fancy planning firm behind our name make or break great places.

-We are charged with creating rural and urban transit systems: Generally, we have the final say about how people get around. Drivers licenses, bike lane approval, and the number of buses or train cars are all government worker decisions.
-We can and must wrangle the political system: This includes public comment periods, concerns about Agenda 21, and just general concerns about getting ourselves into too much civic debt. Also, we may have been in a political campaign, which if done right means we shook every hand and kissed every baby in our community. We know our community and we know how to mobilize them for good will.
-We know how to finance our initiatives: Instead of drawing pretty pictures that can cost whatever it takes, we take grant allotments and make it happen on the budget we have. Often that means we get have to get the community involved or there is no project. And with tactical urbanism and other small-scale movements that incorporate elements of new urbanism, we can have a taste of full community involvement along with good urban design.
-We make laws that encourage or discourage good placemaking: The zoning code or lack of one is in our laps. Same with housing a planning department. Or the decision to go with form-based or Euclidean zoning. Plus, there’s all the behavioral laws that can encourage or discourage good placemaking.
-And finally we can turn spaces into civic spaces: We create the public parks and public squares. We protect the first amendment and allow free speech. We can also deny civil rights in our spaces. Ultimately, we hold the keys to space, unless it’s under tribal control or agreed upon to be shared in some other international agreement.

So to all my folks who are closer to the government side of the sector, take pride. Without us, there wouldn’t be a placemaking discussion at all.

I also welcome continued discussion on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Image above by Flickr user WELS.net under a Creative Commons License.

The Black Urbanist is written by me, Kristen E. Jeffers. I hold a Master of Public Affairs focused on community and economic development from the University of North Carolina Greensboro, which I just finished in May of 2012. I graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in communication with a concentration in public relations from North Carolina State University in 2007. My main gig is being the Public Affairs Officer for the North Carolina Humanities Council, which I also started in May of 2012. I released my first e-book, "Killing the Civic Inferiority Complex" in May of 2012. In May of 2011 I presented at my first CNU NextGen on Cultural Urbanism. At the 2012 CNU, I debuted the concept of the Civic Inferiority Complex. Also in 2012, I spoke at the UNC Global American South conference on the reverse migration of African Americans. I am a featured contributor to "The Atlantic Cities" and "Sustainable Cities Collective." I have also contributed articles to "Grist", "Next City", "Better! Towns and Cities", and "Urban Escapee."
pub-8897335176358686
  • http://twitter.com/blackurbanist/status/207430307136286720/ (@blackurbanist) (@blackurbanist)

    NEW BLOG POST- How folks on the gov. side of #cities make or break #urbanism and #placemaking. http://t.co/g8EeaLP9

  • readerareadevelopment

    Yes, government workers and officials are in control of the ultimate decisions to be made, but rarely do these decision makers have the vision of creating “place.” Most are just doing their jobs without a greater understanding.

    I understand the real problems that are faced, but without the full implementation of plans you get left with a hodge-podge of things that get through to final approval.

    So you are correct that public servants make these places but few are great. Cities are very complex and with so many people coming and going it gets harder to have a clear and concise plan everyone agrees upon.

    • Kristen Jeffers

      This is true, but I’m not letting them off the hook. The city of the future is going to be one where we not only make sure people are prosperous and happy, but where we create a sense of place. Honestly, if more of these places go bankrupt and have to start from scratch, with volunteer labor, they will understand what it means to define what your place is and what it’s supposed to look like. In the meantime, I hope more read this site and sites like Strong Towns and get a real grip on how planning needs to go forward.

  • Inyhbm

    These government workers preempt my ability to make these decisions for myself. So unless I am one of the government workers, my abilities are stifled and stunted.

    • Kristen Jeffers

      That is the point, the government workers often inhibit process and need to be trained better. I know in my program, I did a lot of self study to make sure I knew about urbanism and good placemaking. I hope some of these officials read this and realize how powerful they really are, not just how “popular”.

      • Inyhbm

        ”need to be trained better.”
        This still implies that others know better than I what is best for me. The government workers must justify the continued existence of their positions and thus create a never-ending stream of regulations and restrictions. Would you not be insulted if I should say that I know better than you what is best for you? It takes lots of time and money to comply with these regulations.

  • http://twitter.com/gunthercito/status/207477946477330433/ Günther (@gunthercito)

    “@blackurbanist: NEW BLOG POST- How folks on the gov. side of #cities make or break #urbanism and #placemaking. http://t.co/XMGx9qJj”

  • http://twitter.com/suzytravelguru/status/207657544733298688/ Sustainability Guru (@suzytravelguru)

    Five Ways #Government Workers & #Officials Are Master Placemakers http://t.co/o2iMl7ri #GoodGovernance #Sustainability #Resilience

The Case for a Lazy Urbanism

Urbanism should be second nature, not bound by jargon or complex activities.

Development Types Are Not an Euphemism for Race

ShareDuring a conversation at the recent Streetsblog training in Kansas City, I mentioned again the story of why the site [...]

Transit + Roof + Food + Education + Job + Proximity + Sense of Place = Good Life. A Broken Equation?

It shoudln’t be, but sadly, in many cities, it is.

Guest Post: Yes, A City Can and Should Have It All.

Graham Sheridan, masters candidate in public administration at Brown University, takes my civic-infereiorty complex to task and demands that a city can and should have it all.

Why Do Southerners Go Crazy Over Snow?

Because it happens just enough to both enchant us and drive us crazy.

Mixed-Use Ain’t Always Pretty

Let’s not fall into the trap that mixed-use is only a building code or type.